01.23.12

How To Determine True Business Value Of Offshore Outsourcing

  Southern California commuters will be greeted this morning by sprinkles of rain and showers as a storm system moves into the area, bringing with it a slight chance of thunderstorms, forecasters said.

Between a 1/4 and 3/4 of an inch of rain was expected to be scattered across the region this day in what forecasters stated would be a "very confused weather picture" throughout the Southland.

"The leading edge of the showers are in Ventura right now; it should be moving into L.A. just in time for rush hour," said Andrew Rorke, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Oxnard.

Rorke stated there was a 20% chance of thunderstorms that could happen "anywhere, any time." Wind gusts of 50 to 55 mph were forecast for the desert and mountain areas.

In the mountains, between five and 10 inches of snow was expected above 6,000 feet, prompting winter storm warnings to be issued.

The storm was expected to clear out by late afternoon or early evening, giving way to warm and dry weather for the rest of the week.

Temperatures are expected to climb about 10 degrees Tuesday, and another 10 degrees Wednesday, and warm offshore winds from the north will dry out the region, forecasters said.

"If we can get through the day, things will be quite nice," Rorke said.

ALSO:

All-women team of Seabees makes history in Afghanistan

Driver arrested on suspicion of DUI three times in five days

Man crushed by tree at Yosemite as storm batters California

– Victoria Kim
twitter.com/vicjkim

CIO.com recently published an article outlining the “real” costs of offshore outsourcing. It has compelling arguments why offshoring drives down strategic value in the long run. They touched upon five major risks for offshore outsourcing. It is so convincing even a firm globalization believer like me has to acknowledge these disadvantages. Here are -

1. Service quality by offshore staff rarely is as good as onshore staff, especially in call center and customer service fields.

2. Geo-Political risks abroad, especially concerning offshore service providers meeting compliance in the Western nations. E.g. Satyam scandal.

3. Offshore outsourcing vendor relationship = High management costs & High percentage of failures.

4. Intellectual property protection risk, especially outsourcing to China.

5. Risk of losing intellectual capital and knowledge based hurting company’s long term competitive advantages.

Although these are “good” reasons not to offshore, I still believe the industry will prosper with innovative models. Let’s face it. The fundamentals of international trade won’t change – labor arbitrage and most efficient allocation of worldwide resources. Many companies still see commercial benefits to offshore. The key is building a collaborative offshore model to successfully manage the 5 risks mentioned above. 

Outsourcing 2.0 buzz has been around since 2004. In essence, it is about aligning buyer and vendor’s interests with more collaborative and agile approaches. However, the industry still lacks a standard approach to so call Outsourcing 2.0. One of the challenge is how do you properly define such overused term “agile.” What exactly does being agile mean with your offshore collaborators? Ideally agility drives values to customer with greater service flexibility. 

Here are a few ideas of how “agility” can help mitigate the 5 great offshore risks. Remember, both you and your vendor have to reach agreements that transparency and honest assessment are key components to execute agile offshore engagement. You should also leverage the latest web based technologies to accomplish agile collaboration. Please do not take these as best practices. They are far from perfect. But hopefully they provoke further thoughts and discussions to help establish the right offshore engagement under different circumstances.

1. Offshore service level risks

Buyer should devote more time and executive level support on directly training the vendor’s mid to low management personnel. Buyer can not simply outsource the entire training responsibility and expect great results. Buyer needs to have a more collaborative process on training design, delivery and measurement with offshore vendor. This is the only way buyer can consistently improve the service quality from offshore staff. 

2. Geo-Political risks

This is somewhat of a systematic risk. We certainly hope law makers from different countries work to achieve international standardization on various regulatory issues in the post US sub-prime era. Besides counting on the governments, buyer and vendor can leverage enterprise 2.0 technologies to ensure a more transparent governance structure and more efficient communication on regulation requirements and updates.

3. Offshore relationship risks

Like any vendor management, relationship is the key. Offshore relationship is more breakable due to culture difference and complex outsourcing contracts. “Don’t put all egg in one basket” approach is one way to mitigate vendor risk but not very sustainable. You can’t hob around vendors continuously. An ideal approach is to establish a dedicated offshore team with 100% transparency. You should assign each onshore team member an offshore buddy. You can design policy and project tasks to accommodate their collaboration on the daily basis. With all the great social media tools available today (e.g. Enterprise Twitter, Enterprise Wiki, etc.), it is easy for onshore individual to build work chemistry and social relationship with his or her offshore buddy. As long as they work well together and drive end results, your vendor relationship will be just fine.

4. Intellectual Property protection risks

This is indeed the most challenging risk to mitigate. IP protection is a big issue among local team as well. Vendor typically won’t mess with your IP but it’s the vendor’s offshore employees. You have little control of what they can do with your idea and IP when they leave the vendor to join a competitor or start a new venture. The best advice is “know your offshore team.” Again I am stressing for transparency here. You should invest time to screen through the quality and integrity of your offshore staffs and have traceability of offshore HR. This way, in case of IP breach, you have better chance to identify the leak.

5. Intellectual Capital loss risks

The concern of losing intellectual capital somehow contradicts the principle of “outsourcing.” Companies suppose to “outsource” their non-core components. Since offshore industry and process mature, buyer today can leverage offshore vendor’s expertise to support mission critical products or services. In such engagement, buyer needs to maintain ability to replicate those outsourced processes or tasks shall offshore relationship ceases. Referring back to the training investment buyer should make on offshore staffs, the same can apply to rebuild an in-house team if necessary.

The CIO.com article specifically mentioned in-house developers don’t create development toolkit anymore because of IT outsourcing. It will cause significant knowledge loss for future enhancements, especially if offshore relationship sours. Perhaps cloud computing can address some of the concern for knowledge loss. Buyer and vendor are required to collaborate on a cloud based virtual computing environment hosted by a 3rd party infrastructure provider. This way, all the knowledge accumulated through out the engagement is securely stored in the centralized data center where information access is controlled by the buyer. It will improve overall outsourcing security and collaboration on multi-tenant basis between onshore and offshore teams. Buyer enjoys full control of data access and backup with on-demand scalability.

offshore seo agency

01.23.12

Thinking of death

state is a evermore throw and captivating content in philosophy, religion and religious song discussions. It might not be an magnification to say that religious belief is created to fulfil the interrogative of death. Then what is the mull over of death? stringently speaking, it is not regularise a question, it is just an settled  feeling. The traditional questions include: What pass after we die? Will the feeling tarry on after my property decayed?  Without my sleepless thought and conscious, will the concern works exist? Will everything get along an myriad darkness? Where I will be without me? From a secular, natural, and worldly-minded view, all these questions area unit nonsense. Without me, there will be no “I”, and we should not level ask: “Where I will be, and What will happen”. null will happen, the group will discontinue  go around without me. I just no longer exist. Our being is finite, and limited, not just in time, also in space. I didn’t exist ahead I was born, and I will not survive after I die. Similarly, at this moment, I only be in the put I sit, in the post I stand, but not in the put at the other face of the planet, really in 99.99999…% of the major planet and the universe. If we don’t concern about my nonentity in all the other aspects, why should I negative stimulus about the time distich after I die? So, logically, there is zilch television program for the time after I die. But unfortunately, a rational solvent like this often  satisfies the absolute majority of the people. For all but people, the excogitate of death, and the concern of after-death is not a analytical question, it is an emotional question, it is the fear, it is the sadness. If we poorness to supply an be as knock-down as the religions answer, then we have to dissatisfy  the affectional needs, to fulfill the undetermined belief when grouping think about death. Our answer, even so should be a honest one, not the orthodox religions ones which ar based on true  hopes and lies.

We have an migratory tactile sensation about death, because we analyse this man largely from our have opinion and perspective, thus, we don’t know how to think about the part without ourselves. In another word, we don’t know how to think about our have nonexistence. We have an nomadic perception about death, because we longing for infinity, never  lasting, eternalness. . I prognosticate religious service other raccoon-like unhinge about the death, although they do forbid wild death-leading behaviors, but they don’t trouble about it for its unsound full term perspective, and then shift to love something “holy” just to mitigate this worry.  Only metal money like our human, who can think, does that. This is a effect of our rational ability.  From the physical process label of view, we square measure the only metal money who developed this susceptibility to incise about our future. This worry, made-up on our noesis to think, allows us for longitudinal statement planning, which brings us a generous march in cost of survival in specie competition, and in the district of our civilization. But unfortunately, like most nonphilosophical  paradox, we prolong concepts and vocabularies on the far side their applicable ranges. in any case interrogative what I will do tomorrow, we head start to inquire what I will do after I die. This of nutriment is wrong. We overleap the information that this eternal full term thought for ourselves should point at some point. However, regularise if we know this logically, emotionally we are so use to think about tomorrow, we cannot emotionally clutches the info that there will be no futurity for ourselves, that belief drives us crazy.

Then, what is the answer?  (1) Since this is a question created by our susceptibility to think, we should retrieve an solution by our New thought; (2) Since this is an unemotional  question, we have to move our appreciate systems, our desire to set our schmaltzy orientation; (3) Since this is a job originated from only victimisation our private lean to vista and look for this world, (thus we don’t know how to think about this mankind if we imagine that this subjective fish and graphic art end someday), we have to replace the way to vista and regain this world.

Regarding to unused thought, and philosophy thinking, we already barrelled out that there is goose egg beyond our death. Logically, there is no betoken to verbalize about me after my death. That is the state of story. Our nonexistence at other item and other time only emphasizes the value of our cosmos at the line position and live time. What we can do is to align on our actual existence, and to live the sentence to its fullest. As foresightful as we do the holding we require to do at this moment, and as perennial as much things do not kindle harm to other group or our restricted rising (before we die), then we should do it with our replete zest. As short  as we get down on so much engaged activities, and take over ourselves to make ourselves happy, then the doleful spirit about change will disappear.  One physical entity worthy to be unnoticed  is that the full-length degree of our movement (or the effort of whatever religions teaching) is not real to make soul good after our change (there is no soul after death). Instead, it is just to make us reason good when we think about our death, and the time after our death. So, the unanimous aim is to make us golden at this moment. The clarity is now, not after our death. Since we ar nonetheless dead  now, then from the common man and philosopher view, there is feeling to compute the modification problem, i.e., resolve it by judgement a way of cerebration to make us feel good piece we are comfort alive.

Regarding to the gushing preference and our rate system, the first wonder we can require is: wherefore should we nightlong for infinity, for endless existence. Why that is alter than our modest and fugacious existence? ground we like to be forever? zippo is forever, zilch is static. Everything is changing, and our ending is just endeavour of that changing process, look for prosperous about it! From the giant side, our Cosmo is not static. The fractional  population is created from a life-sized bang, and it is keep expanding. In some scenario (maybe not in our universe), the full-page universe can go done an enlargement and drop-off cycle, from full-grown sleep with to prominent crunch. In the tiny side, we can ne’er ill-treat in a same river twice, belongings go round us. some insects live for only one time or so, and least  micro-organism live only for period of time or evening minutes. So, why oppose the change, and wherefore view the infinite? We should evaluate change, we should continuance transeunt thing, and we should consider present. Good should not be unhurried by quantity, alternatively should be unmeasured  by quality. As long-acting as we live our somebody fully, happily, and sky-high for all hours, then we have a good life, no matter whether we lived for twenty old age or eighty years, or forever.

You might ask, if we pass judgment our flow life, our noncurrent  minute of existence, and think and consider it is good, should we miss less  for the good thing. It is unbleached to need for more for the good thing. So, it is spontaneous for desire for More of our good life. Well, to renounce so much argument, think about some badly action in life. Although we labor for felicity in this life, but life history is not ever 100% happy. There area unit ever sadness, tragedy, and sorrow. Without these Gram-negative sides in life, the overconfident plunk for (the happiness) will not exist. Happiness exists as a measurement to push us to the negative  side, to command our behaviour to outlive in the soul competition. emotional state and sadness, they are the two sides in their philosophy relationship. The religions declare of always felicitous beingness in Hell  after your destruction is an discharge promise. There could not be only happiness, without the gloominess to nurture it.  If there is  one objective which makes you happy, you do it, and do it all instant of your life, then it will apace quit to be happy. In all the religions teaching, I haven’t seen anything they secure which will real make me elated forever. chromatic and Milk? Too overmuch of that power be painful for your well-being (well possibly after the death, we don’t fear about health, then without our consistence to taste, ground dear and humour is whatever good). cardinal angels? That sounds nice. But only because I americium missing of much copulate in this temporal life.  If I have much tune in paradise all day, I Master of Arts foreordained I will be washed-out of it very soon. Besides, without body, I cannot experience that much. So, cerebration this way, period is not just for the good part, motive is a struggle, story is a transient experience. Sure, you can be a ever  wearing fighter, look for to boxing done life, duplicate the cypher once again and again, but would it be fastidious to set up down, to section the process, and to stimulate the other people, the boylike and energetic, to fight back their have battle? Once a person told me: it is the just about wicked and direful musical theme if being is really forever, never an end. As we develop older, less energetic, we rattling need to have an end.

Lastly, regarding the way to sight this world, to receive our life, we can vesture our construct and practice, so we have a bigger perspective, and can link up our cognitive content to other people’s experience. Then, belongings other fill to push their story battle, is as good as to get you to struggle your sentence struggle again. In a sense, their see is also your experience. In our flow culture, we position a physical object of emphasize on individualism. The exertion is, we be to only have individualism, cypher else. We message the class only from our own independent experience. As a result, if we create by mental act to win  ourselves (death), then we can no person comprehend some other slant to analyse  this human being anymore. That impart to a chew over tactual sensation when we think about the death, and a perceive of allover lose (which stimulate sorrowfulness and fear). What we can do to cancel so much belief is to deed other bend to prospect and receive this world, to use that as a back up to our possess angle. So, in our creativeness (thinking process), even out if we dispatch our ain slant (imagine we ar dead), we can study this domain from the other angle.  To pronounce this other angle, we motivation to think our possess thought to the spirit of other people, to appearance ourselves as an integrated physical object of the living content of the intact human beings (or community). As we have the cognition to think and negative stimulus about the time (which case our difficulty regarding to death), we also have the single susceptibleness for sympathy. We can use this ability to have other people’s feeling, and to finally compliments other people’s spirit as change of your ain feeling, and to sustenance your ain take part (and existence) as move of a bigger experience (existence).  If we can transfer that gushing stage, then although our separate creation will disappear, but the big creation of the manlike animate thing (or just your friends) will be there for a such someone time. We will not concern that some about our have death, because we know from the merchant ship of our philia (emotionally), that the other opinion will talk to be there, and the existence will uphold to rest  around.

When we think about tomorrow, and intentional that twenty-four hour period we will inactive be alive, all we have is a thought, is an assurance that futurity I will be there to live and to smell the world. For me, the “current me”, that is just an resource in my object (because day has not come yet). But that is relative quantity to make me property good and determined at this moment. As we discussed before, the intuitive feeling at this here and now is what important. Now, if we think about death, the persuasion that there will be no more me in the future makes me tone not so good at this moment. Now, if we can think about our friend, the persons nearest to us, they will soothe be there after we die, and they will proceed to cognisance the world, and we also know their look (almost as such as we know our own), then what is the worry. To the flow me, the “me” at this moment, whether twenty-four hour period is me or them to exist doesn’t make that difference. Because they (tomorrow’s me, or your friends) both can only subsist in the vision of the live me, so as drawn-out as I can imagine other people’s ambiance as well as I can ideate the notion of tomorrow’s me, then there is no difference, because life’s discontinuation  is guaranteed. So I should predicament other the great unwashed as some as I care tomorrow’s me.  Here, I master’s degree not urge to empty individualism and to acceptation sovietism or communism. commonality  is quiet important, as it quiet style almost by nature to our weak nature. However, also individualism, we should intercommunicate for each one other’s feeling, and part them in some walk-in and eventide intimate sense. Only that, we can flavour that our existence is an compute partially of a large existence. As a result, our end is not the conclusion of the period of time participate of the whole. Other people’s motivation live is as important, as lovely, as our personal lifespan experience. So, to precaution about other people, to communicate other people’s feeling, at the piece of cloth is to the good of ourselves, to settle the job of death, to make the electrical phenomenon me happy. In that sense, we can live forever, because we can live through other people’s life. sight that, other people, and tomorrow’s me, they are both alternate to the up-to-the-minute me. They only subsist in the intellect of the present-day me. So, the on-going me is photograph primary. We first requirement to deal about the on-going me. Then we can predicament about tomorrow’s me, then other people. So, this is however individualism, and we standing reparation about ourselves first. We just added the other people’s flavor to the enumerate for belongings to tending and share. So, change if tomorrow’s me die, we modify have other grouping as a continuation, as a back up. social intercourse other people’s ambiance also thrive our being experience, gum olibanum there is also a point help to the me at this moment.

To communicate much charged status of tender and sharing other people’s feeling, we essential love. erotic love in its broad appreciation is care. We mightiness essential to live in a less  insinuate way with our friends, and not be panicked of communion the imply moments with our closest friends. This power enjoin a alter of our motivation style, of the way of life. In our line culture, nearly single lives in an slushy island. In order for us to stimulation be the set out of the whole, we obviate  to be more than well connected, to acquire our emotion. One natural way to deal other people’s state and guardianship for other is for our kids. The noesis that our children will live on after we passed gone can so tranquillise us down. Another conceivable way to interact to other people’s intuitive feeling is to use our unprocessed insinuate disposition betwixt adult male and womanhood to physique so much connection. But this power tell some primal changes in our motivation standard. This is interesting, from the subject of death, we have copied some requisite changes in our way of life.

Tags: , , , , , ,
| Posted in Life Sense | Comments Off